Sunday, February 28, 2010

Innocence: Three Essays About Ourselves

Innocence, it's something we're all born with, but what does it mean to be innocent? Merriam-Webster defines innocence as "freedom from guilt or sin through being unacquainted with evil." In seemingly unrelated essays, Judith Ortiz Cofer, Eric Schlosser, and Nora Ephron show us how innocence is something we all have, and try to protect.

In her essay, "The Story of My Body", University of Georgia professor Judith Ortiz Cofer, shows us how easily our experiences can affect our innocence. A Puerto Rican native, Cofer was only a young girl when she had her "first experience" with "color prejudice." Things like prejudice are what take away our innocence. You can no longer be unacquainted with evil when you are "born a white girl" but become "a brown girl." Her experience with a racist butcher further exposes her innocence. The butcher doesn't see a blameless young girl, but instead, a kid with "dirty hands" who may be trying to rob him. His words make the author examine her hands for herself; she exposes herself to guilt for doing nothing wrong. Luckily her innocence proved to be it's own defence. She realized her hands were clean. The real sin was with the man "in the stained apron." So sometimes we lose our purity through our experiences, but sometimes we keep it.

In "What We Eat", by National Magazine Award winner Eric Schlosser, we gain insight into how the masses protect their innocence when big conglomerate's "obliterate regional differences." He shows us how easy it is to stay innocent when you're only one among millions. There is simply no way that one person can be responsible for the growth of "about one thousand" McDonald's in 1968, to "about thirty thousand restaurants" today. We try to preserve our innocence by being anonymous. Ignorance can also give us the protection we need from guilt. When you're getting a cheeseburger you don't see yourself as "wiping out small businesses." You don't feel guilty when a Mom and Pop store closes because you stopped shopping there long ago. Finally, he shows us how we protect our innocence by placing the blame somewhere else entirely. It's not our fault if we don't shop locally, after all, "an instinct to avoid the unknown" actually makes us mistrust the small local stores. We feel safer knowing that our brands "products are always and everywhere the same." In the end our innocence is safe behind a smoke screen of millions of other people, we never consider that we could be at fault.

Finally, Esquire magazine senior editor Nora Ephron shows us how people defend their innocence from the perceived evil of death, in her essay "The Boston Photographs." It centers around newspapers printing photographs of a young woman falling to her death, and the criticism they generated from the public. People from around the world sent in letters about the pictures. Most of the letters expressed anger at the newspapers for showing "a human being in terror of imminent death." The majority of the people were trying to stay unacquainted with this evil fate by telling the newspapers not to print pictures of it. Pictures bring the reality too close to home; these were "pictures of death in action." We feel better when we can imagine things as far away and not happening to us. What shows most clearly the defence of people's innocence is something the author talks about specifically: "the death of the woman." People tend to think of death as a form of evil, especially death at a young age. If the woman had lived there would have been nothing to defend against; no evil to stay unacquainted with. The implication of evil in the pictures was enough for people's innocence to seek shelter; to write letters saying I want to see no more.

I believe life is a difficult journey and it's only natural that we want to stay free of guilt and sin. Nobody wants to think they are putting others out of business, or think their hands are "dirty", or be reminded of our own mortality. These three essays may seem to be different, but they can give us insight into parts of our own humanity.

1 comment:

  1. I like your theme of innocence...I should have thought of that.
    Good use of quotes.
    Consider the ending of Schlosser's portion...I like the messaqe but the transition seems out of place.
    Perhaps I missed something...but did you post Ephron and a conclusion?

    ReplyDelete